NFL
Chargers' Offensive Collapse Is Fixable—But McDaniel's Play Design Is Slowing Execution
Through two games, Los Angeles has stumbled to 0-2 with an offense that ranks 29th in points per drive; the problem isn't talent, but timing and discipline on tape.

The Los Angeles Chargers arrived at 2026 with legitimate optimism. Rashawn Slater and Joe Alt anchored the tackle room, Justin Herbert would finally run Mike McDaniel's scheme, and a retooled defense promised stability. Two weeks in, the Chargers are 0-2 with losses to Arizona and Las Vegas—and the offense has become the primary culprit. Their EPA per play and offensive success rate match the Cleveland Browns for league futility. They rank 29th in points per drive (1.22) and 7th-worst in EPA per drive (-0.78). The remaining schedule before Week 7's bye includes road trips to Buffalo, Seattle and Kansas City, plus a Denver home game. The math is simple: one more loss before the bye and the Chargers' season tilts toward crisis.
What makes the collapse particularly frustrating is that the mechanics are recognizable. McDaniel's Miami offenses thrived on misdirection, jet motion and speed to create numbers advantages in the run game. The foundation is there—the personnel, the coordinator's system, Herbert's arm talent. But execution has been chaotic. The Chargers lead the league in penalties per offensive snap (tied with Green Bay for fumbles) and have gifted possession after possession through unforced errors. One interception came when David Njoku bobbled the catch and coughed it to a Raiders defender. Another featured teammate interference on a completion attempt. These aren't scheme failures; they're rehearsal failures.
The fixable layer, however, runs deeper than penalties. McDaniel's play designs have incorporated unnecessary complexity—added spinners, delayed motions, layered reads—that extend the play clock before receivers reach their breaks. On a third-and-1 designed to feature fullback Alec Ingold, an added spinner motion gave blitzing defenders time to scrape the backside. The timing window that makes McDaniel's offense sing in Miami requires precision that the Chargers haven't yet internalized. Hampton's carries average 2.8 yards, well below league median, and the efficiency shortfall traces to scheme execution, not blocking or run-back skill. This is correctable through repetition and simplification—strip the flash, lock in the timing, let the players' talent operate within a tighter framework.
For bettors, this diagnosis reshapes offensive prop angles dramatically. Herbert's passing volume and TD rate are suppressed not by scheme limitations but by execution drag—penalties wiping out drives, turnovers stalling momentum before play-action looks materialize. As the offense stabilizes over the next 2-3 weeks, expect a sharp uptick in both passing yards and touchdown efficiency. The line has already priced in some dysfunction (Vegas is low-ish on Chargers team totals), but the adjustment assumes this is a talent problem. It's not. It's a timing problem. Teams that fix timing problems do so visibly within a compressed window; the Raiders tape showed a unit that looked unrehearsed, not untalented. Expect a correction starting Week 4. Omarion Hampton's rushing volume should also spike once the run game's timing synchronizes; early-week unders on both Herbert and Hampton props offer value against a market still pricing in two weeks of chaos.
The defense remains a separate concern—new coordinators often require weeks to establish communication and coverage assignments. But the offense, despite its embarrassing start, has a clear repair path. McDaniel has adjusted systems before. Herbert has executed at MVP level. Slater and Alt provide elite protection. The question is whether the Chargers correct within two weeks or spiral into a deeper hole. The schedule doesn't grant them much mercy, but execution improvements are almost always faster than talent acquisitions.